Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Mental Toughness

Mental Toughness is a personality trait which is integral to understanding how people respond to stress, pressure and challenge. Research shows that mental toughness is a key factor in resilience and sustainable performance. It can account for up to 25% of the variation in an individual’s performance and is a significant factor in well-being. Are you Mentally Tough?


Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Are you just incubating?

I hear it all the time from clients, "help me with my procrastination." This article by the "Indian Jones of Positive Psychology" Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener, puts a whole new spin on the philosophy behind procrastination. Are you a true procrastinator - OR - are you just an incubator? Read more to learn more......

 
Are you a procrastinator or an incubator?
By Robert Biswas-Diener, Oprah.com
February 16, 2010 

As a university instructor, the close of each academic term is always the same for me: I get a flurry of apologetic e-mails from panicked students who have put off their homework and term papers until the last possible moment. They beg for an extension.

Procrastination is a phenomenon that is familiar to everyone, even outside of academia. Who really likes to wash laundry, balance checkbooks or fill out complicated tax forms? Most folks put these activities off in favor of more pleasant pastimes like socializing, going out to eat or reading a good book.

Procrastination is the result of having very little motivation for a boring or unpleasant activity and it is something everyone experiences. The real problem is that procrastination can sometimes overshadow a hidden strength.

Incubation is not procrastination
I once coached an extraordinary young man, whom I'll call Mark. Mark was at the tail end of his training at a prestigious medical school. When we met on a Monday of his last week, Mark told me he felt the stress of a number of weighty assignments, all of which had pressing deadlines.

He had only a handful of days to write applications for internships, turn in final papers and secure letters of recommendation. It was a tremendous amount of difficult work to be completed in a short period of time. Mark asked me to check back with him midweek to crack the whip and make sure he was still making progress on his work.

When we spoke again on Wednesday, Mark had fallen into a deep funk. Not only was there no progress, but he had frittered away hours in meaningless pastimes like downloading music and walking in the park.

Mark uttered the all-too-familiar phrase, "I am such a procrastinator!" He vilified himself for checking e-mail, having lunch with his wife and other activities that appeared to be in the service of avoiding his more pressing tasks.

Something about the word "procrastinator" just didn't fit with what I was seeing. Here was a young man about to graduate from an elite medical school with a flawless academic record extending back into his middle school years.

My instincts told me that it was not a lifetime of chronic procrastination that led Mark to his current situation. On a hunch, I asked him a crucial question, "When you get around to completing your work -- and we both know that you eventually will -- how will the quality be?"

My client seemed taken aback by the question. He answered with confidence, a single word: "Superior!"  I realized, in that moment, that there may be a subtle but important difference between the "back burner" mentality I saw in my client and the traditional way a procrastinator works.

Procrastinators may have a habit of putting off important work. They may not ever get to projects or leave projects half finished. Importantly, when they do complete projects, the quality might be mediocre as a result of their lack of engagement or inability to work well under pressure.

What Mark presented was something qualitatively different: a clear sense of deadlines, confidence that the work would be complete on time, certainty that the work would be of superior quality and the ability to subconsciously process important ideas while doing other -- often recreational -- activities.

I realized I was looking at a strength, one I called "incubator." When I shared this term with Mark, he felt as if the weight of the world had been lifted off his shoulders.

What does incubation mean?
One of the greatest difficulties with identifying an incubator is that they often look like procrastinators. People with both work styles tend to put off work until the last moment, and both seem to be best motivated by external pressures such as deadlines.

Importantly, people with both work styles are likely to be hard on themselves and consider themselves lazy.

In a pilot study with 184 undergraduate university students, we were able to isolate specific items that distinguished incubators from the rest of the pack. Incubators were the only students who had superior-quality work but who also worked at the last moment, under pressure, motivated by a looming deadline.

This set them apart from the classic "good students," the planners who strategically start working long before assignments are due, and from the procrastinators, who wait until the last minute but then hand in shoddy work or hand it in late.

For most incubators, having a label that is less pejorative than "procrastinator" can be a breath of fresh air. Incubators tend to be bright, creative people with an amazing gift to work hard under pressure. As such, they can be very dependable in work situations that require last-minute changes or tight deadlines.

The other side of this coin is that they can be frustrating to work with because they appear to sit idle for so long. For incubators, it can be as helpful to appraise friends, family members and co-workers of your natural work style so the people around you can adjust their expectations accordingly.

Setting realistic expectations for yourself can let you off the emotional hook as you appear to waste time, solid in the knowledge that your projects will be completed when they need to be.

My former coaching client, Mark, actually built in "incubation time" during which he could watch movies, listen to music or other goof-off activities, knowing that -- below the surface -- his mind was preparing for work and that he would snap into action when the time was right. As for my students requesting extensions for their term papers, they should have planned ahead!

Are You an Incubator? Use the scale below to answer the following questions:
4 - Perfectly describes me
3 - Describes me somewhat
2 - Does not really describe me
1 - Does not describe me at all
A. _____ I always get my work completed on time.
B. _____ The quality of my work is superior.
C. _____ It takes a looming deadline to motivate me.
D. _____ When I finally get to work, I feel highly engaged.
E. _____ I surprise myself by moving into action at the last minute.
F. _____ I do my best work under pressure.
If you scored a 20 or higher, you may be an incubator.

Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener is on the editorial boards for the Journal of Happiness Studies and Journal of Positive Psychology and is the author of "Practicing Positive Psychology Coaching, Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth" and "Positive Psychology Coaching."


Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Self Esteem vs. Self Compassion

Self Esteem vs. Self Compassion

We have all heard about self-esteem and the pros and cons of either having too much or not enough, but here is a different take ~ Self-Compassion. I like this blog post because it links back to Acceptance Commitment Therapy (ACT) techniques, as well as, methods we use in Positive Psychology: e.g., being mindful.

Check it out:
http://blog.pickcrew.com/truth-about-self-esteem/


self-compassion

Tell me what you think? What this blog helpful? Does it send the right message to help you in your search of balance over the self?

Friday, July 25, 2014

The-5-Most-Popular-Pieces-I-Have-Ever-Written by Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener

Check out the most popular blog posts by the "Indiana Jones" of Positive Psychology:  Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener.



http://myemail.constantcontact.com/The-5-Most-Popular-Pieces-I-Have-Ever-Written.html?soid=1102621930729&aid=lMCNVhw6lb8





The 5 Most Popular Pieces I Have Ever Written

Over the years there have been a few pieces of writing I have done that have really captured public interest. Here is a greatest hits of sorts of topics ranging from revenge to happiness. I hope you enjoy them and share them with others:

1. What happy people do differently:

 In this cover article from Psychology Today co-author Todd Kashdan and I offer a new take on happiness. 


2. Revenge is good for you:

Everyone knows that revenge is bad. Except for when it is good. 



3. 5 Myths about positive psychology:

Because it is positive people want to believe in positive psychology. Although there are many terrific scientific findings emerging from this field there are some that have been mis-interpreted. 


4. Are hook-ups psychologically healthy?

I wrote an uncharacteristic piece on sex just to see how popular a topic it is. More than 80 thousand people read the post and the number grows daily. Read it to see what's so tantalizing! 


5. Your happiest days are behind you. 

In this TEDx talk I argue that the past is an overlooked repository of happiness. I also have the opportunity to tell one of my favorite stories:




 You will find breaking news, fascinating research results, the best blogs and other great material. https://www.facebook.com/PositiveAcorn 

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Tips on Communication:

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Are you a humble leader?

Moral wisdom for the modern world
by Michael Austin

Humility: Humility is a trait worth having.
Published on June 27, 2012 by Michael W. Austin in Ethics for Everyone
*The violet is a symbol for humility, in some traditions.

Recent studies show that humility is connected with many forms of pro-social behavior. While some misunderstand humility as low self-esteem or self-denigration, a proper conception of this virtue has both self-regarding and other-regarding components. The humble person keeps her accomplishments, gifts, and talents in a proper perspective. She has self-knowledge, and is aware of her limitations as an individual and as a human being. But humble individuals are also oriented towards others, they value the welfare of other people and have the ability to "forget themselves" as well, when appropriate.
Interestingly, the empirical research on humility shows that this trait has great value. Humility has been linked with better academic performance, job performance, and excellence in leadership. Humble people have better social relationships, avoid deception in their social interactions, and they tend to be forgiving, grateful, and cooperative. A recent set of studies also shows that humility is a consistent predictor of generosity.1 People who are humble tend to be more generous with both their time and their money.

Some philosophers historically have not been impressed with humility. Aristotle leaves it out of his catalogue of virtues, while both David Hume and Friedrich Nietzsche are critical of this trait.
Hume, for example, says:

"Celibacy, fasting, penance, mortification, self-denial, humility, silence, solitude, and the whole train of monkish virtues; for what reason are they everywhere rejected by men of sense, but because they serve to no manner of purpose; neither advance a man’s fortune in the world, nor render him a more valuable member of society; neither qualify him for the entertainment of company, nor increase his power of self-enjoyment? We observe, on the contrary, that they cross all these desirable ends; stupefy the understanding and harden the heart, obscure the fancy and sour the temper. We justly, therefore, transfer them to the opposite column, and place them in the catalogue of vices"2

However, the empirical evidence seems to show that this sort of criticism of humility is mistaken. Humility can advance one's fortune in the world, as it is a distinguishing trait of CEO's of successful organizations. The connection between humility and generosity shows that it does render one a more valuable member of society. Others see humble individuals as well-adjusted and kind. It looks like the empirical evidence about the value of humility shows us that Hume's rejection of it was a mistake.
Given its appropriateness for us as limited and fallible human beings, and its value for both individual flourishing and social welfare, humility is a trait worth cultivating.



------------------------------------------------------
1 Julie Exline and Peter Hill, "Humility: A consistent and robust predictor of generosity," The Journal of Positive Psychology (May 2012): 208-218. This article contains the references related to the other empirical findings related to humility discussed above.
2 An Enquiry into the Principles of Morals (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983), pp. 73-74.


Sunday, June 8, 2014

Personality Assessments: Myers-Briggs vs. The VIA Survey

http://www.viacharacterblog.org/whats-the-difference-between-myers-briggs-and-the-via-survey/


WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MYERS-BRIGGS AND THE VIA SURVEY?

mbti and VIA SurveyThis is a common question we get here at VIA, so we decided to compare these two popular personality tests. Learn the answer below!
Whether you are a practitioner, career counselor, clergyperson, avid reader, or layperson, you probably know your “type” according to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). You know whether you prefer to be more introverted or extraverted, thinking or feeling, sensing or intuiting, or judging or perceiving. The MBTI has been one of the most popular tests in pop psychology for decades. People who have taken the test love to guess one another’s type (I’m an ENFP turned ENFJ).
Another test that has emerged as the main research-based test of strengths in the world is theVIA Survey. The VIA measures strengths of character and in a short period of time has had over 2.6 million takers reaching every country. The 24 character strengths measured have been found to be universal across countries, cultures, and beliefs. These include strengths such as fairness, social intelligence, kindness, curiosity, bravery, and humility. Like MBTI fanatics, people particularly love to spot character strengths in others. A few of my highest strengths are hope, curiosity, love, and perspective.
If you are a practitioner, you will encounter clients who have taken these tests or would like to. Understanding some of the similarities, differences, and potential ways to integrate the two tests can be useful to you, both personally and professionally. Let’s take a closer look at each:
Similarities
  • Both address personality traits (although MBTI calls these “types”).
  • Both inform one’s self-knowledge.
  • Both are used widely with “normal” populations, and used extensively by general consumers and professionals
  • Results on either test are not “good or bad” or “right or wrong,” nor do they reveal problems or psychopathologies.
  • Both are translated into over 20 languages.
  • Both reveal results that are immediately understandable and user-friendly.
  • All people have unique preferences (MBTI) or strengths (VIA) which color their perceptions and underlie their values, interests, needs, and motivations.
Differences
  • What is measured:
    • MBTI: measures preferences and how people perceive their world.
    • VIA: measures character strengths, core positive capacities for thinking, feeling, and behaving in ways that benefit others and oneself.
  • What traits are valued?
    • MBTI: your personal type (you receive 4 letters which stand for your traits/preferences).
    • VIA: all 24 character strengths are valued, but the biggest value are your signature strengths – those highest in your profile and most essential to who you are.
  • History:
    • MBTI: decades long tradition
    • VIA: one decade history
Approach:
  • MBTI: categorical approach, like the DSM. Individuals are given a type – a label.
  • VIA: dimensional approach – you have more or less of each character strength.
Scientific support/peer-review:
  • VIA: based in science, significant scientific support; about 200 peer-reviewed papers on the VIA Survey/VIA character strengths since its onset in 2004.
Theory:
  • MBTI: based on a specific theory (Carl Jung’s type theory from a century ago).
  • VIA: explicitly was not created as a taxonomy of strengths (rather, it is a “classification” system) and by definition, is not based in theory.
Big 5:
  • Personality researchers focus extensively on a model of personality called the Big 5 which refers to a handful of general, personality characteristics in people (you can be high or low in extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism).
  • MBTI: Research has found that the MBTI scales are generally subsumed within the Big 5 traits and therefore do not have much additive value.
  • VIA: New research has found that VIA adds something important (referred to as incremental validity) over and above what the Big 5 predicts about human beings.
Morality and goodness:
  • MBTI: measures traits that are morally neutral (extraversion/introversion; sensing/intuiting).
  • VIA: many strengths have a significant moral component; all are slanted toward being positive (even though all can be overused); the strengths can be used to facilitate goodness.
Cost:
  • MBTI instrument: Fees to use the test. E.g., $120+ to take the test and receive a report/consultation.
  • VIA Survey: Free.
  • The flagship conference in the field is the biennial International Positive Psychology Association (IPPA) which focuses on disseminating the latest science and evidenced-based practices in positive psychology. The science shared at this conference can be seen as an indicator of what is most important in the field, current trends, areas with the most substance and interest, etc.
  • MBTI: At the most recent IPPA conference (2013), MBTI was noted in the title of 0 presentations.
  • VIA: At the most recent IPPA conference (2013), VIA character strengths (or specific VIA strengths) were part of approximately 133 presentations.
Deliberate intervention impact:
  • MBTI: there is less purpose/desire for using deliberate interventions to impact one’s type.
  • VIA: there is significant interest across professional disciplines in directing interventions to improve strengths of character. Character strengths can be impacted by deliberate interventions (e.g., boosting the strength of gratitude by counting blessings or writing a gratitude letter).
Interaction/Integration
There is currently no precise approach for integrating the MBTI and VIA nor is there consensus on who would benefit most from such an approach. Studies and discussions are needed. Here are some starting points:
  • As I said in an earlier post that compared the VIA Survey and StrengthsFinder: It’s very difficult to conceive of a scenario where using the VIA Survey to assess, explore, and intervene around strengths would not be useful. In addition, in some situations, there is benefit to adding StrengthsFinder, MBTI, or another test to complement the VIA Survey. Whichever test one adds will probably be based on one’s training, interest areas, and needs/goals of the client.
  • The MBTI sixteen “types” can each have different character strength profiles, distinct from one another and within one another. For example, not only can an INFP have a different character strengths profile from an INTJ, but all INFPs can have entirely different character strength profiles from one another.
  • Jung believed that all preferences could be modified by working on their shadows (with the exception of the Extroversion/Introversion which he noted is fundamental to a person’s personality). Perhaps a person’s signature strengths can be used to work with one’s shadow? Does a person’s shadow reflect the overuse and underuse of character strengths?
  • Certain types or dimensions of MBTI might be expressed through character strengths. For example, a person high on Feeling or on Thinking can look at the emotional or cognitive expression of any of the 24 strengths. What does my signature strength of creativity feel like? What are the thoughts associated with my gratitude or bravery strengths? Those who are high on Feeling or on Thinking will be well-equipped to take this approach with their strengths.
  • It can be interesting for any person to reflect on how their character strengths map out onto their MBTI type. E.g., how is my signature strength of curiosity expressed in my type?
  • Research findings using MBTI and the VIA Survey:
  • From Choong & Britton (2007):
  • We found significant covariations between 10 character strengths with single type dimensions namely, creativity (intuition), open-mindedness (thinking), love of learning(introversion), integrity (sensing and thinking), persistence (judging), vitality (extraversion),love (extraversion and feeling), fairness (sensing), and gratitude (extraversion). Love, integrity, and gratitude also covaried with multiple paired type combinations while curiositycovaried only with one paired type combination (introverted intuition). (p. 9)
From Munro, Chilimanzi, & O’Neill (2012):
  • Significant differences were found between five of the 24 VIA-IS character strengths and three of the four bipolar categories of MBTI type. In particular, when compared withintrovertsextraverts reported significantly stronger scores for the character strengths ofcuriosity and humour, while the character strength of appreciation of beauty and excellence was significantly higher in the MBTI preference of intuition (when compared with sensing). Finally, the character strengths of capacity to love and be loved andgratitude were stronger for those with the MBTI category of feeling (when compared with those in the category thinking). (p. 15)
Take Action
Learn more about character strengths or about the MBTI.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

How Can I Figure Out What I Really Want to Do With My Life?

If you are in transition or thinking of a transition, check out this recent Time Magazine article:

http://time.com/2799361/how-can-i-figure-out-what-i-really-want-to-do-with-my-life/


How Can I Figure Out What I Really Want to Do With My Life?

May 30, 2014
by Oliver Emberton, founder of Silktid

You know how anyone can be anything they want, right? Well, they can’t.
Had Bill Gates been born in a different time – or just a different town – he might have spent his days as an illiterate peasant scooping up potatoes with his hands.
Your circumstances matter.Bill’s real childhood had what mattered most: the opportunity to stumble upon what he was born to do, and to go completely bananas doing it.
Few are so lucky, but there’s still hope for the rest of us.

Kids are geniuses
We rarely prize people for acting like a child. The world is forever telling us to “grow up” and “take responsibility”, as if anything else is a bug in the system. On the contrary – childish behaviour can be quite brilliant. Kids try many things. Stupid things, like eating soil or rollerskating on ice. But they’re fearless and relentless.

Kids don’t know what they don’t know. So they question everything.
Kids are easily bored. They live in fantasy worlds because present reality is limiting.
Such behaviour is spectacularly good at figuring out the world and your part in it. Acting like a kid is a brilliant way to explore your boundaries and deduce your strengths. Ideally, your childhood is when you stumble upon your passions, leaving your adult years to focus on them.
Unfortunately many of us – like Bill the Potato Farmer – aren’t so lucky. The good news is, modern life gives you more chances than ever to fix that.

Grown-up children
Childlike behaviour is generally frowned upon as an adult.
The great advantage of being an adult is you can direct yourself. Children don’t have the freedom or the awareness to steer their own development. Maybe your childhood wasn’t what it could have been – but you can fix it now: Play. 

The first time baby John Lennon picked up a guitar, I doubt he seriously ran a cost benefit analysis. If you’re trying something out, don’t be in too much of a hurry to take it seriously. Aim to simply enjoy. The effort will come if the passion is there.

Get reckless. 
If you really don’t know what you want to do,you’re going to have to try things you haven’t done yet. And you’re going to fail – a lot – trying many different things, most of which won’t work. Kids find this a lot easier because they don’t worry about consequences. I encourage you to do the same. If it helps, make it a proud part of your identity: you’re making a point out of fearlessly trying as many things as possible, you sexy roguish daredevil you.

Question everything. You know how everyone knew the world was flat until it wasn’t? You have similarly limiting beliefs in your head right now – probably things like “artists can’t earn a living” or “I’m not smart enough to do this”. Maybe, but have you checked? Have you tried – really tried, like a gun is pointed at your kneecaps – to find an alternative? Most really successful people didn’t just find a way, they created one.

Ignore reality
You know how kids always dream of becoming astronauts, pop stars and giant transforming robots? Barriers don’t apply when you’re five years old. And whilst that seems like a stupid habit that you’d be wise to grow out of, if you’re not sure what you want to do, don’t be in such a hurry to shut your dreams down. Explore the impossible. Often it doesn’t lead to exactly what you’re after (say walking on the moon) but it finds something else instead (like a love of science that starts a whole career). You can’t know this in advance. Just dare to follow where your heart takes you.

Chances are, even if you don’t know what you want, that your childhood at least left you some hints. Are there things you think of fondly, but never find the time for? Start there.
The great solace you have is that – by virtue of reading this – you automatically have better options than potato farmer Bill. Access to the entirety of human knowledge (The Google) for one. Better economics for another. And more freedom than most of your grandparents could ever conceive of.

Now get outside and play!